Skip to main content


Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Table 2 Parameters of interest for characterisation of hPSC culture surfaces and analytical methods for their assessment

From: Defining synthetic surfaces for human pluripotent stem cell culture

Parameter Analysis method Pros Cons
Surface topography Atomic force microscopy (tapping mode) Compatible with an aqueous environment, can view individual proteins that have absorbed to the surface, modern instruments acquire images at a faster rate. Images are generally of a small area, therefore may not be representative.
  Scanning or transmission electron microscopy Widely available Resolution is not as high, significant sample preparation is required, unable to quantify topography.
Ligand density ELISA assays Straightforward assay Not very sensitive for adsorbed protein, requires antibodies to specific proteins or molecules.
  Fluorescence from adsorbed or covalently attached fluorophore Relatively straightforward assay Microenvironment and dye-dye quenching effects from surface anchored species introduces artefacts, construction of calibration curve difficult.
  Fluorescence from fluorophore released into solution Quantitative, sensitive, relatively straightforward assay Cleavable fluorophore needs to be synthesised and chemically attached to ligand/CAM.
  Lanthanide (e.g. Eu-chelate) labelling of ligand Quantitative, sensitive, relatively straightforward assay Need to carry out chemical coupling of Eu-chelate to ligand.
  Radio-labelling of ligand Quantitative, sensitive, relatively straightforward assay Complex chemistry required to either radio-label pre-synthesised ligands or synthesise ligand with radioisotope-containing precursors.
Chemical properties Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) Straightforward sample preparation Solid-state NMR generally not sensitive enough, complex spectra.
Wettability Water contact angle Simple Very non-specific - many adsorbed species can modify wettability,
Chemical composition (directly detecting protein adsorption) X-ray photoelectron spectrometry Elemental composition quantitative, sample preparation is very simple (removal of buffer salts and drying). Elemental composition is straightforward but high resolution spectra complex, amide bond-containing materials generate false positives, no specificity in relation to protein type, ultra high vacuum technique (can cause structural rearrangements).
  Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry Minimally-destructive, minimal sample preparation, efficient, Analysis generally not quantitative, produces large data sets often requiring statistical methods, no specificity in relation to protein type, ultra high vacuum technique (can cause structural rearrangements)
  Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy Widely available, can be powerful if coupled with synchrotron Not “surface-sensitive” enough, no specificity in relation to protein type.
Indirect assessment of protein adsorption Embryoid body adhesion assay Straightforward if embryoid bodies are being generated in house Expensive, time-consuming
  HeLa or other e.g. L929 cell adhesion assay Reliable, cheap if cell lines are available in laboratory Cell attachment for cells other than hPSCs may be mediated by different ligands.
  1. Surface topography, ligand density, chemical properties, wettability and protein adsorption can be tested by the methods listed. Pros and cons are listed for each method in this non-comprehensive list.