Skip to main content

From wound response to repair – lessons from C. elegans

Abstract

As a result of evolution, the ability to repair wounds allows organisms to combat environment insults. Although the general process of wound healing at the tissue level has been described for decades, the detailed molecular mechanisms regarding the early wound response and rapid wound repair at the cellular level remain little understood. Caenorhabditis elegans is a model organism widely used in the field of development, neuroscience, programmed cell death etc. The nematode skin is composed of a large epidermis associated with a transparent extracellular cuticle, which likely has a robust capacity for epidermal repair. Yet, until the last decades, relatively few studies had directly analyzed the wound response and repair process. Here we review recent findings in how C. elegans epidermis responds to wounding and initiates early actin-polymerization-based wound closure as well as later membrane repair. We also discussed some remained outstanding questions for future study.

Background

The efficient healing of a wound is essential for preventing the pathogen invasion, internal tissue loss, and organism survival (Gurtner et al. 2008). Rapid wound healing is indispensable since non-healing wounds such as severe trauma can be fatal, and injury-related mortality takes up 10% of deaths worldwide (Norton and Kobusingye 2013). Delineating the molecular mechanism underlying tissue repair can help people improve their quality of life. Although it is well documented that the main events of wound healing relay on the cooperation of multiple cells, how the tissue and cell immediately detect, respond to, and repair the wounds in vivo remains poorly understood (Enyedi and Niethammer 2015). Thoroughly dissecting the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying wound repair is essential to develop strategies to intervene or regulate the early cellular response of wounding and to enhance the migration of epidermal cells to heal chronic wounds that cause health and economic burden.

The normal epidermal wound repair process in mammals usually involves three phases at the cellular level (Gurtner et al. 2008). During the early stages of the wound response, platelets and clotting factors gather at the wound site to mediate hemostasis and activate inflammatory cells. The intermediate stage includes the proliferation and migration of epithelial cells and angiogenesis. The later stage consists of remodeling the extracellular matrix (ECM), leading to the recovery of barrier and scar formation (Martin and Nunan 2015). The possibility of infection and secondary damage are positively correlated to the time during which an open wound is exposed to risky extrinsic factors; thus, it is critical for epithelial cells to evolve the ability of early wound detection and rapid response (Enyedi and Niethammer 2015). Previous studies using both invertebrate and vertebrate animal models have revealed that the efflux of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) from dying cells serve as the initiation factors in the early wound signaling cascade (McDonald et al. 2010; Niethammer 2016; Zhang et al. 2010). However, DAMPs face difficulty in constructing a sophisticated signaling system in the context of epithelial wounds because the environmental or luminal fluid at the wound site may rinse and dilute DAMPs (Niethammer 2016). To establish an extracellular gradient of signal molecules near the wound site, paracrine and transcription-independent signals released by damaged cells at the wound site are strong candidates.

Using anatomically simple and genetically tractable animals as models can illuminate the roles of essential genes and molecules involved in wound response and repair. During past decades, much work has been done by using C. elegans, Drosophila, and zebrafish, to dissect the logic of wound response and wound repair genetically (Galko and Krasnow 2004; Love et al. 2013; Martin and Lewis 1992; Stanisstreet 1982; Wood et al. 2002; Xu and Chisholm 2011; Yoo et al. 2012; Yoo et al. 2011). Besides, many transcriptional-independent signals were demonstrated as immediate responses to wounding (Cordeiro and Jacinto 2013). For example, researchers found that wounding induces Ca2+-dependent dual oxidase (DUOX) production of H2O2 gradient and mediate the rapid recruitment of leukocytes (Niethammer et al. 2009). Subsequent studies find that H2O2 responding to wounding plays a conserved role in multiple organisms required for tissue repair and regeneration (Love et al. 2013; Razzell et al. 2013; Suzuki and Mittler 2012; Yoo et al. 2012).

C. elegans is an emerging model organism in the context of regenerative medicine due to its access to live imaging and diverse genetic techniques (Xu et al. 2012). With the help of live imaging, it is relatively efficient to investigate the wound detection, response, and repair processes (Xu and Chisholm 2014b) (Table 1). Wounding the epidermis triggers at least two parallel responses, including innate immune response and rapid wound repair response (Chisholm 2015; Chisholm and Xu 2012). The innate immune response involves the upregulation of a suite of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) (Pujol et al. 2008). Wound repair response involves a Ca2+ mediated rearrangement of the actin cytoskeleton (Xu and Chisholm 2011). Interestingly, mitochondria can actively respond to wounding and protect from damage to promote actin-polymerization-based wound closure (Fu et al. 2020; Xu and Chisholm 2014a). These processes appear to be initiated independently, yet, their coordinated activity ensures the animal to survive otherwise fatal epidermal wounds. In this article, we review the recent works focusing on the wound response and repair process in C. elegans epidermis.

Table 1 Time-courses of the wound response and repair in C. elegans epidermis

C. elegans epidermis as a model to study wound response and repair

C. elegans skin is composed of a simple epidermal epithelium syncytium and an external cuticle (Chisholm and Hsiao 2012) (Fig. 1). Although the skin structure of C. elegans is different from that of the mammals, it exhibits several similarities in wound response and repair, including activation of the innate immune system and remodeling of the permeability barrier (Xu et al. 2012). Compared to mammals, the epidermal syncytium of C. elegans is closer to a single-cell wound model, lacking cell division and angiogenesis, which are essential steps in mammalian skin regeneration (Eming et al. 2014). However, as a differentiated barrier epithelium model, the simple structure and transparent layers provide an ideal platform to trace molecular changes both in a short time and a large scale. The wound healing process after epidermal injury allows organisms to regain the epithelial integrity. By targeting this process, potentially novel therapeutic strategies could be developed to treat wounds in various pathophysiological settings.

Fig. 1
figure1

The difference between mammalian and C. elegans skin. C. elegans attains a simple but tenacious body structure through evolution. During the embryonic stage, a group of epidermal cells undergo a series of fusions and to develop a large multinucleated syncytium hyp7. The syncytium will secrete the cuticle, an overlaid sheath of an extracellular matrix consisting of collagen, lipids, and glycoproteins. As a result, there are two layers within C. elegans skin: epidermis and cuticle. When the worm gets fully matured, the skin gets postmitotic and can only grow through polyploidization. On the other hand, the mammalian skin is a stratified epithelium made of keratinocytes in each layer. The basal layer contains stem cells that can proliferate and push daughter cells to migrate toward the surface. Due to the lack of oxygen and water around the outer layers, keratinocytes will die and cornify at the surface. These dead cells can compose the stratum corneum, which is the primary permeability barrier of the skin

Epidermal wounding induces transcriptional-dependent innate immune responses

The first wound response to be elucidated in the worm is the transcriptional regulated innate immune response in the epidermis. The nematode skin is under hydrostatic pressure; therefore, puncture damage can be fatal if not rapidly healed (Kurz and Ewbank 2000). Such damages may be common in nature, where nematodes frequently encounter damaging substrates and cuticle-puncturing pathogens (Vidal-Diez de Ulzurrun and Hsueh 2018). Analysis of the epidermal innate immune response to damage began with pioneering studies of skin-penetrating pathogens such as Drechmeria coniospora, which generate invasion spores that stick to the cuticle extend hyphae through the underneath epidermis to kill the animal eventually (Jansson 1994). Fungal infection specifically induces epidermal expression of a large set of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), including a MAPK cascade induced the neuropeptide-like (nlp) genes (Couillault et al. 2004), and a TGF-β cascade induced caenacin (cnc) genes (Zugasti and Ewbank 2009).

The process of skin penetration by fungal hyphae is reminiscent of epidermal damage, leading to the question of whether innate immune responses to infection are specific to the pathogen or are more general responses to the damage. Using needles or lasers to wound the skin, Pujol et al. showed that physical damage was sufficient to induce some of the epidermal AMPs activated by infection, through the same signaling cascade involved in AMP induction after infection (Pujol et al. 2008). The Toll-Interleukin-1 Receptor (TIR) domain adaptor protein TIR-1 (orthologous of mammalian SARM) could trigger the p38 MAPK pathway, and TIR-1 itself is activated by protein kinase C (PKC) TPA-1(Couillault et al. 2004; Ziegler et al. 2009). Wounding also induce the TGF-β cascade dependent expression of CNCs (Zugasti and Ewbank 2009), but how TGF-β signaling responds to wounding is not yet clear. It is worth to note that the epidermis can also recognize the damage through hemidesmosomes associated with a STAT-like protein, whose disruption led to the detachment of STA-2 molecules from hemidesmosomes and initiation of the AMPs induction (Zhang et al. 2015), indicating that diverse strategies might be used as a response to epidermal damage that triggers the active innate immunity to protect from infection.

Nonetheless, there are some differences between the innate immune response to pathogen infections and skin wounding. First, some genetic mutations, such as the NIPI-3 mutant, only block the infection-specific branch of the signaling pathway but not wounding (Pujol et al. 2008). Second, two of six nematode phospholipase C genes, PLC-3 and EGL-8, act upstream of PKC TPA-1, and the response to physical damages is primarily influenced by PLC-3 but not EGL-8 (Ziegler et al. 2009). Despite the diversity of signaling, the upstream of phospholipase C, Gα, and Gβ protein genes GPA-12 and RACK-1, could be induced by both fungal hyphae and physical injury (Ziegler et al. 2009; Zugasti et al. 2014). G protein signaling in the innate immune response to wounding indicates that one or more GPCRs might be able to sense tissue damage, which will be a promising avenue for future investigation.

Interestingly, the wound-induced innate immune response is negatively regulated by a death-associated protein kinase, DAPK-1 (Tong et al. 2009). A point mutation in dapk-1(ju4) displays constitutively elevated levels of epidermal AMPs, and genetic interaction studies indicate that DAPK-1 acts upstream of p38 MAPK pathways. The gain-of-function of GPA-12 also displays a constitutively elevated expression of NLPs (Ziegler et al. 2009). This constitutively innate immune response defends against opportunistic infection at wounds, since p38 MAPK mutants display reduced survival after epidermal wounding (Tong et al. 2009; Xu and Chisholm 2011). However, the p38 MAPK cascade was not shown to be required for other wound healing processes, such as wound closure and scar formation (Pujol et al. 2008; Xu and Chisholm 2011). How DAPK-1 regulates p38 MAPK cascade activity remains to be investigated.

Epidermal wounding triggers direct actin polymerization that drives wound closure

Diverse early wound signaling cascades share a common goal that the epidermal damage should be healed and recovered immediately. The physical breach on the epidermis of the nematode will be patched with the help of nearby dynamic cytoskeleton and membrane vesicles beneath it. Recent findings indicate that wounding triggers a rapid actin polymerization, which forms into actin rings surrounding the wound site to close the wound (Xu and Chisholm 2011). Importantly, efficiently closure of these actin rings is required for the post-wounding survival of the animal. The actin cytoskeletal dynamics after the injury have also been discovered in other animal models. In the Drosophila embryo, the wound site was closed by actomyosin cables in a “purse-string” manner (Martin and Lewis 1992; Wood et al. 2002), whereas in Xenopus oocyte, the closure of the injury requires both actin cable formation and Ca2+ activation (Benink and Bement 2005; Clark et al. 2009).

Importantly, wounding induced actin cytoskeleton is not an actomyosin cable but rather a CDC-42 small GTPase and Arp2/3(ARX-2 in worms) dependent direct actin polymerization (Xu and Chisholm 2011) (Fig. 2). In contrast to actomyosin cables in Drosophila embryonic and larvae wounding (Galko and Krasnow 2004; Martin and Lewis 1992), the nematode actin ring formation is negatively regulated by RHO-1 and non-muscle myosin (NMY), including myosin heavy chain NMY-1/2 and myosin light chain MLC-4 (Xu and Chisholm 2011). RHO-1 and CDC-42 might directly antagonize, as described in Xenopus oocyte wounding (Vaughan et al. 2011). Alternatively, the enhanced closure seen after inhibition of RHO-1 or NMY-1/2 might be an indirect consequence of the reduction in actin cable formation at the wound site. Thus, in this sense, epidermal wound closure in C. elegans might resemble the repair mechanisms in other adult epithelia, in which the repair is mostly driven by filopodial protrusive activity at the leading edge (Sonnemann and Bement 2011). It would be interesting to determine whether and how RHO-1 and CDC-42 respond to wounding for the locally simultaneously activation in the future.

Fig. 2
figure2

Wounding induces Ca2+ and mitochondrial responses that promote actin-polymerization to repair the wound. Wounding can trigger an instant rise in the epidermal cytosolic Ca2+ level. TRPM channel GTL-2 in the plasma membrane and IP3 receptor ITR-1 located at the endoplasmic reticulum contributes to the initial of Ca2+ activation. Through the mitochondrial Ca2+ uniporter MCU-1, cytosolic Ca2+ enters into the mitochondria matrix and triggers the production of mtROS. Besides, Ca2+ also regulates wound-induced mitochondrial fragmentation (WIMF) through the outer mitochondrial membrane protein MIRO-1 to enhance the mtROS signals. The epidermal wound is essentially closed by direct actin polymerization, which is dependent on Ca2+ activation. mtROS regulates the local activation of small GTPases RHO-1 to promote actin polymerization based wound closure

Like DAPK-1 negatively regulates the wounding-induced innate immunity, a point mutation of dapk-1(ju4) also results in a faster actin-ring based wound closure and hypertrophic cuticle growth (similar to hypertrophic scar formation) at the head region (Tong et al. 2009; Xu and Chisholm 2011). The similarity in the effects of DAPK-1 and non-muscle myosin on wound closure can be accounted for since the myosin light chain is a known target of Dapk1 in mammalian cell (Bialik et al. 2004). The inhibitory role of DAPK-1 in the wound closure, together with previous evidence that DAPK-1 inhibits the response of innate immunity subsequent to damage. In light of that, DAPK-1 can act as a negative coordinate regulator for both innate immunity and wound repair pathways (Tong et al. 2009; Xu and Chisholm 2011). Recently, a forward genetic screen revealed that a point mutation on the gene ptrn-1, which encodes the microtubule minus-end binding protein Patronin (Nezha homology in mammals), could completely suppress either epidermal or innate immunity phenotype in the dapk-1 mutant (Chuang et al. 2016), suggesting an unexpected interdependence of DAPK-1 and the microtubule cytoskeleton maintenance of epidermal wound repair and integrity. However, how microtubule dynamics regulate epidermal wound closure remains little understood.

Epidermal wounding induces immediate transcriptional-independent Ca2+ elevation in vivo

How does the epidermal cell sense the damage and initiate rapid innate immune responses as well as actin polymerization-based wound closure? Generally, Ca2+ takes part in various cellular functions, and its critical role in the repair process has been revealed at the cellular level (Lansdown 2002; Stanisstreet 1982). Thanks to the application of genetically encoded Ca2+ sensor GCaMP3, a fusion protein expressed by the transgenic worm, it becomes possible to trace the spread of Ca2+ inside the epidermis of C. elegans (Xu and Chisholm 2011) (Fig. 2). Both laser and needle wounding triggers immediate elevation of Ca2+ that can persist for at least 1 h. Candidate RNAi screening result found that the knockdown of membrane-bounded gtl-2 (TRPM channel) or itr-1 (IP3R on the Endoplasmic Reticulum) significantly reduced Ca2+ elevation after wounding, suggesting that both extracellular and intracellular store contributes to the wounding-induced Ca2+ elevation. Further genetic identification finds that a Gαq EGL-30 and its effector PLC-β EGL-8 are required for epidermal Ca2+ signaling, acting through the ITR-1 (Xu and Chisholm 2011). Interestingly, a Drosophila injury response requires the function of the TRP channel TRPM (Antunes et al. 2013) and Brv1 (Turner et al. 2018). In zebrafish, TRPV1 functions in keratinocyte migration, mechanistically relevant to wound healing (Graham et al. 2013). Whereas the exact role of TRP channels in epidermal Ca2+ homeostasis is likely to evolve differently between species, these findings suggested that TRP channels are both conserved and plays a crucial role in wound response and repair.

Wounding-induced Ca2+ signaling is not required for innate immune response as Ca2+ chelator BAPTA-AM did not affect AMP induction, but significantly reduced the survival rate by inhibiting actin polymerization (Xu and Chisholm 2011). Actin polymerization is also blocked in the gtl-2 mutant, the defects of which can be partially rescued by incubation in buffers with high external Ca2+concentration (Xu and Chisholm 2011). In Xenopus oocyte, the wounding of a single cell activates both small GTPase Cdc42 and Rho, via a Ca2+ dependent signal (Benink and Bement 2005; Clark et al. 2009). It is reasonable to postulate that epidermal wounding induces the elevation of Ca2+, which subsequently triggers the local activation of these small GTPases. If so, an important goal in the future will be to define molecules responsible for GTPase activation in response to wounding and to dissect how these themselves are regulated in the epidermis.

Wounding induces mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake dependent mitochondrial ROS production in the epidermis

Mitochondria are the energy hub of the cell that responds to metabolic signals and produce ATP to support cellular homeostasis. Unexpectedly, we observed that for the first time, epidermal wounding could dramatically trigger the activation of mitochondrial ROS (mtROS) superoxide sensor mito::cpYFP flash around the wound site (Xu and Chisholm 2014a), suggesting an elevated level of mtROS produced in the mitochondria after wounding. Increased production of mtROS as a consequence of MCU-1 dependent mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake (Xu and Chisholm 2014a). Based on the time courses of mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and mitoflashes after wounding, the initial Ca2+ uptake by mitochondria may trigger the mtROS production through the opening of the mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP), whose molecular identity remains elusive yet. mtROS levels were also shown to be elevated in fibroblasts wounding (Janda et al. 2016), the injured skeletal muscle (Horn et al. 2017), and also in Drosophila dorsal closure (Muliyil and Narasimha 2014), a developmental process analogous to aspects of wound healing. These findings demonstrate that mtROS may play a conserved role in regulating wounds in a barrier epithelium.

Further studies have shown that mtROS play protective roles in skin wound repair in vivo (Fig. 2). The mtROS burst can locally inhibit a small GTPase RHO-1 and promotes direct actin polymerization to close the wound hole (Xu and Chisholm 2014a). Conversely, inhibition of mtROS by antioxidant treatment blocks wound closure. The elevated level of mtROS causes local inhibition of RHO-1 activity by targeting on a redox-sensitive motif, enhancing the actin-based wound closure. Recently, Ca2+ triggered mtROS production facilitating wound closure has been shown in injured skeletal muscle cell repair in mice, and RhoA is activated to promote F-actin accumulation for wound healing (Horn et al. 2017). In mammals, tissue injury-induced mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation regulates the repair of multiple tissues, including the epidermis (Cano Sanchez et al. 2018; Janda et al. 2016). Thus, mitochondria play diverse roles in tissue repair after damage, and manipulation of mtROS may be of interest in therapies for accelerating tissue repair.

Although mtROS shows its positive influence on promoting actin polymerization and wound closure in C. elegans, excessive ROS accumulation in humans is commonly known as oxidative stress, which causes the impaired wound healing in patients with diabetes or treated with chemo- or radiotherapy (Schafer and Werner 2008). For example, by measuring the concentration of 8-isoprostanes in fluid from chronic venous ulcers, researchers detect the peroxidation of fatty acids with a high ROS level (Yeoh-Ellerton and Stacey 2003). Due to the substantial oxidizing property of ROS, both C. elegans epidermis and human skin may suffer from oxidative stress, which interferes with the normal repair process. Thus, the balance of generation and detoxification of ROS inside the cell should be considered for wound repair. The mechanism preventing excess mtROS production in C. elegans is worth to be investigated, and considering the short half-life of ROS, reactive oxygen is often converted to more-stable molecules such as H2O2 (Xu and Chisholm 2014a), and the regulation of H2O2 production may play an important role in controlling the level of mtROS.

Wounding induces mitochondrial fragmentation to promote wound repair

It is well known that mitochondria form a highly dynamic tubular network within cells, reflecting a balance of fusion and fission events linked to the ATP production and oxidative metabolic requirements of the cell survival. Our recent study found that wounding also triggers rapid and reversible mitochondrial fragmentation, a process refers to as wounding induced mitochondrial fragmentation (WIMF) (Fu et al. 2020). Moreover, U2OS cell scratch wounding and zebrafish tailfin wounding also show similar mitochondrial fragmentation phenotype (Fu et al. 2020), suggesting that WIMF may be a general wound response mechanism. Importantly, loss of function in two genes, fzo-1(Mfn1/2 homology) and eat-3(Opa1 homology), whose activities are required for mitochondrial fusion (Hoppins 2014), leads to chronic mitochondrial fragmentation and faster-wound closure (Fu et al. 2020). Consistent with this finding, mitochondrial fragmentation has also been found to promote cellular repair (Horn et al. 2020) and Drosophila embryonic wound healing (Ponte et al. 2020), suggesting WIMF is not only a rapid wound response but also plays a conserved role in regulating wound repair.

How wounding triggers mitochondrial fragmentation? An outer mitochondrial membrane protein RNAi screen was conducted to identify the potential molecule responsible for sensing the wounding signal. The result showed that WIMF does not depend on the master fission regulator DRP-1 but instead requires the Ca2+-sensitive mitochondrial Rho GTPase MIRO-1 and cytosolic Ca2+ (Fig. 2). Interestingly, Nemani et al. also reported recently that elevated cytosolic Ca2+ induces a mitochondrial shape transition in HeLa and MEF cells are dependent on MIRO1 but not DRP1 (Nemani et al. 2018), suggesting Ca2+-MIRO-1 plays a vital role in regulating mitochondrial morphology under diverse stresses and wounding. Moreover, a recent study report that plasma membrane injury in MEFs induces Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation, which enables localized signaling required for cell repair (Horn et al. 2020). It would be fascinating to investigate whether and how wounding induced mitochondrial fragmentation through different downstream targets in diverse models. Possibly the amplitude or local nature of the wound-induced Ca2+ transient is sufficient to trigger a more rapid mitochondrial fragmentation response via diverse downstream molecules. How Ca2+ regulates MIRO-1 or Drp1 through their local activity cause mitochondrial fragmentation remains to be determined.

Ca2+ mediates diverse biological processes, including synapse activation, neuronal activity, fertilization, etc. These are unrelated to tissue injury, raising the question of how cells distinguish between wound-induced and physiological Ca2+ transients. Previously, our study has shown that wounding triggers mtROS production, mediated by MCU-dependent mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, and that mtROS can promote wound healing (Xu and Chisholm 2014a). We recently found that MIRO-1 is another key downstream target of Ca2+, which is independent of MCU-1 dependent Ca2+ uptake into mitochondria (Fu et al. 2020). Thus, wound-induced Ca2+ signals may act via multiple effectors to generate a protective mtROS cascade in regulating tissue repair. The other endogenous targets of wounding-induce Ca2+ influx remains to be discovered.

Mitochondrial oxidative and cytochrome P450 signal in wound response and wound repair

Genetic and transcriptomic analyses have shown that enhanced mitochondrial fragmentation accelerates wound closure via the upregulation of mtROS and Cytochrome P450 (CYPs). Our study found that mitochondrial fragmentation can trigger mtROS production and expression of oxidative signaling genes like CYP-13A8 (cytochrome P450 in humans), which in turn maintains a high level of reactive oxygen species (ROS), resulting in the improvement on wound closure (Fu et al. 2020) (Fig. 2). Moreover, overexpression of cyp-13A8 in nematode epidermis enhances mtROS and promote wound closure. CYPs have been shown to respond to wounding and accelerate wound epithelization in diabetic mice (Zhao et al. 2017), hairless mouse ear (Sander et al. 2011), and even in plants (Noordermeer et al. 2001). This study, consistent with others, suggests that CYPs may be vital in mediating oxidative signals that promote damage repair, although it is so far unclear how CYPs respond and triggers the oxidative signal to regulate later wound repair. By uncovering a link between mitochondria, CYPs signaling, and wound repair, studies in nematode may open the door to novel therapeutic interventions based on mitochondrial signals.

Wounding induced transcriptional activation of membrane fusion genes that regulate epidermal membrane repair

A fundamental step of wound repair in a single cell is rebuilding the damaged plasma membrane to restore the cellular homeostasis and function (Sonnemann and Bement 2011). The epidermis of C. elegans consists of a syncytium hyp7 that contains 139 nuclei and is the largest somatic cell (equivalent to a giant cell) (Chisholm and Hsiao 2012), the wound repair process of nematode skin is closely related to the membrane repair. It is known that plasma membrane repair requires coordinated activation of several cytosolic pathways, as well as rearrangement from sequential recruitment of different vesicle components to the wound site to restore internal cellular homeostasis and prevent cell death. However, how the hyp7 repair its damaged membrane in the living animal was not known.

Recently we applied single worm RNA sequencing to investigate the transcriptional regulation after epidermal wounding and found that the epithelial-fusion failure (eff-1) gene was highly upregulated (Meng et al. 2020) (Fig. 3). Moreover, EFF-1 protein can be rapidly recruited to the wound site and is required for membrane repair and animal survival. EFF-1 encodes a transmembrane protein with structural homology to viral class II fusion proteins, which is essential for epidermal cell fusion in development (Mohler et al. 2002; Perez-Vargas et al. 2014; Shemer et al. 2004). Interestingly, EFF-1 not only functions as a cell-cell fusion protein (Gattegno et al. 2007; Mohler et al. 2002; Rasmussen et al. 2008; Shemer et al. 2004) but also acts in repairing severed axons (Basu et al. 2017; Ghosh-Roy et al. 2010; Neumann et al. 2015), maintenance of dendritic arborization (Oren-Suissa et al. 2010; Zhu et al. 2017), and sealing of phagosomes (Ghose et al. 2018), suggesting that EFF-1 might play conserved functions in diverse plasma membrane repair after cellular damage. In the damaged epidermis, the accumulation of EFF-1 at the wounded membrane is dependent on the early Ca2+ regulated actin polymerization and the SNARE protein Syntaxin2 (SYX-2). SYX-2 interacts with the C-terminal of EFF-1 to promote EFF-1 localization, an event that may facilitate both intracellular and extracellular membrane repair (Meng et al. 2020) (Fig. 3). It would be interesting to investigate whether and how SYX-2 and EFF-1 repair machinery functions in other membrane repair processes.

Fig. 3
figure3

ESCRT III, SYX-2, and EFF-1 sequential recruitment to regulate membrane repair. C. elegans epidermal membrane repair requires the sequential recruitment of ESCRTIII, SYX-2, and EFF-1 to the wound site. Through exocytosis or endocytosis, pre-existing intracellular vesicles can patch the open wound to carry out membrane repair. As a result of the early wound response, both actin polymerization and Ca2+-regulated ESCRT III signals are required for SYX-2 and EFF-1 recruitment to the wound site

Multiple evidence has shown that Ca2+ regulated exocytosis of pre-existing intracellular vesicles into membrane patches, exocytosis of lysosomes, ESCRT machinery, and membrane lesion removal by endocytosis are all involved in the repair of membrane wounds in a single cell in vitro (Andrews and Corrotte 2018). Our study found that wounding can also induce rapid recruitment of VPS-32.1 (CHAM4B homology), which is a Ca2+-regulated ESCRT III component, and VPS-4 (VPS4 homology) (Meng et al. 2020), suggesting that ESCRT signal plays a conserved role in regulating membrane repair. More strikingly, epidermal specific RNAi knockdown ESCRT components significantly inhibited SYX-2 and EFF-1 recruitment, demonstrating that the sequential recruitment of endoplasmic membrane-localized SYX-2 and exoplasmic membrane fusion gene EFF-1 were dependent on ESCRT III signal, reflecting a potential link between membrane curvature and wound repair. However, how Ca2+ dependent ESCRT III regulates localization and recruitment of SYX-2 and EFF-1 is not yet entirely clear, potentially due to the essential role of critical vesicles that contain SYX-2 and EFF-1. Moreover, how the two fusion protein, SYX-2 and EFF-1, coordinated with each to repair the damaged membrane is not clear. Detailed characterization of the biochemical and biophysical mechanism of SYX-2 and EFF-1 machinery will be crucial for understanding how wounds heal efficiently and effectively in the future.

Conclusion and remaining questions

It is still early days for C. elegans epidermal wound healing studies. However, it is clear that the genetic tractability of C. elegans, combined with the various live imaging opportunities available, will become an even more potent contributor to our understanding of fundamental mechanisms that underpin wound detection, response, and membrane repair. Many questions remain to be answered form initial wound response to the end of the membrane repair. For example, how early wound signals trigger sequential and spatial transcriptional activation are not yet known, nor is the precise mechanism leading to the perfect remodeling of the epidermis. Current studies have established worm epidermis as a new system for membrane repair in the living animal; however, the underlying molecular mechanism for the membrane repair process in either adult or aged animals is poorly understood. Unlike zebrafish or Drosophila larvae wound healing systems, which show robust repair or regeneration abilities, the C. elegans skin repair itself often results in cuticle scarring (Pujol et al. 2008; Tong et al. 2009), yet it is not clear what the scar is and how is formed after the damage.

The powerful genetic screens will undoubtedly reveal novel genes and signaling pathways involved in wound response and repair in vivo that can be further tested in mammals; indeed, the results of nematode studies are already influencing how we approach questions about wound healing in vertebrates. With this proviso, C. elegans now seems to be an important model for studying wound response, repair, and remodeling, beautifully complementing research carried out in other species, including flies, zebrafish, Xenopus, and mice.

References

  1. Andrews NW, Corrotte M. Plasma membrane repair. Curr Biol. 2018;28:R392–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antunes M, Pereira T, Cordeiro JV, Almeida L, Jacinto A. Coordinated waves of actomyosin flow and apical cell constriction immediately after wounding. J Cell Biol. 2013;202:365–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Basu A, Dey S, Puri D, Das Saha N, Sabharwal V, Thyagarajan P, Srivastava P, Koushika SP, Ghosh-Roy A. Let-7 miRNA controls CED-7 homotypic adhesion and EFF-1-mediated axonal self-fusion to restore touch sensation following injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114:E10206–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benink HA, Bement WM. Concentric zones of active RhoA and Cdc42 around single cell wounds. J Cell Biol. 2005;168:429–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bialik S, Bresnick AR, Kimchi A. DAP-kinase-mediated morphological changes are localization dependent and involve myosin-II phosphorylation. Cell Death Differ. 2004;11:631–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cano Sanchez M, Lancel S, Boulanger E, Neviere R. Targeting Oxidative Stress and Mitochondrial Dysfunction in the Treatment of Impaired Wound Healing: A Systematic Review. Antioxidants (Basel). 2018;7:98.

  7. Chisholm AD. Epidermal wound healing in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015;4:264–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chisholm AD, Hsiao TI. The Caenorhabditis elegans epidermis as a model skin. I: development, patterning, and growth. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2012;1:861–78.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chisholm AD, Xu S. The Caenorhabditis elegans epidermis as a model skin. II: differentiation and physiological roles. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2012;1:879–902.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chuang M, Hsiao TI, Tong A, Xu S, Chisholm AD. DAPK interacts with Patronin and the microtubule cytoskeleton in epidermal development and wound repair. eLife. 2016;5:e15833.

  11. Clark AG, Miller AL, Vaughan E, Yu HY, Penkert R, Bement WM. Integration of single and multicellular wound responses. Curr Biol. 2009;19:1389–95.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cordeiro JV, Jacinto A. The role of transcription-independent damage signals in the initiation of epithelial wound healing. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14:249–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Couillault C, Pujol N, Reboul J, Sabatier L, Guichou JF, Kohara Y, Ewbank JJ. TLR-independent control of innate immunity in Caenorhabditis elegans by the TIR domain adaptor protein TIR-1, an ortholog of human SARM. Nat Immunol. 2004;5:488–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Eming SA, Martin P, Tomic-Canic M. Wound repair and regeneration: mechanisms, signaling, and translation. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:265sr266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Enyedi B, Niethammer P. Mechanisms of epithelial wound detection. Trends Cell Biol. 2015;25:398–407.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fu H, Zhou H, Yu X, Xu J, Zhou J, Meng X, Zhao J, Zhou Y, Chisholm AD, Xu S. Wounding triggers MIRO-1 dependent mitochondrial fragmentation that accelerates epidermal wound closure through oxidative signaling. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1050.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galko MJ, Krasnow MA. Cellular and genetic analysis of wound healing in Drosophila larvae. Plos Biol. 2004;2:E239.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Gattegno T, Mittal A, Valansi C, Nguyen KC, Hall DH, Chernomordik LV, Podbilewicz B. Genetic control of fusion pore expansion in the epidermis of Caenorhabditis elegans. Mol Biol Cell. 2007;18:1153–66.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ghose P, Rashid A, Insley P, Trivedi M, Shah P, Singhal A, Lu Y, Bao Z, Shaham S. EFF-1 fusogen promotes phagosome sealing during cell process clearance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Cell Biol. 2018;20:393–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ghosh-Roy A, Wu Z, Goncharov A, Jin Y, Chisholm AD. Calcium and cyclic AMP promote axonal regeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans and require DLK-1 kinase. J Neurosci. 2010;30:3175–83.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Graham DM, Huang L, Robinson KR, Messerli MA. Epidermal keratinocyte polarity and motility require Ca(2)(+) influx through TRPV1. J Cell Sci. 2013;126:4602–13.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008;453:314–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoppins S. The regulation of mitochondrial dynamics. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2014;29:46–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Horn A, Raavicharla S, Shah S, Cox D, Jaiswal JK. Mitochondrial fragmentation enables localized signaling required for cell repair. J Cell Biol. 2020;219:e201909154.

  25. Horn A, Van der Meulen JH, Defour A, Hogarth M, Sreetama SC, Reed A, Scheffer L, Chandel NS, Jaiswal JK. Mitochondrial redox signaling enables repair of injured skeletal muscle cells. Sci Signal. 2017;10:eaaj1978.

  26. Janda J, Nfonsam V, Calienes F, Sligh JE, Jandova J. Modulation of ROS levels in fibroblasts by altering mitochondria regulates the process of wound healing. Arch Dermatol Res. 2016;308:239–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jansson HB. Adhesion of conidia of Drechmeria coniospora to Caenorhabditis elegans wild type and mutants. J Nematol. 1994;26:430–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kurz CL, Ewbank JJ. Caenorhabditis elegans for the study of host-pathogen interactions. Trends Microbiol. 2000;8:142–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lansdown AB. Calcium: a potential central regulator in wound healing in the skin. Wound Repair Regen. 2002;10:271–85.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Love NR, Chen Y, Ishibashi S, Kritsiligkou P, Lea R, Koh Y, Gallop JL, Dorey K, Amaya E. Amputation-induced reactive oxygen species are required for successful Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. Nat Cell Biol. 2013;15:222–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin P, Lewis J. Actin cables and epidermal movement in embryonic wound healing. Nature. 1992;360:179–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Martin P, Nunan R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of repair in acute and chronic wound healing. Br J Dermatol. 2015;173:370–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. McDonald B, Pittman K, Menezes GB, Hirota SA, Slaba I, Waterhouse CC, Beck PL, Muruve DA, Kubes P. Intravascular danger signals guide neutrophils to sites of sterile inflammation. Science. 2010;330:362–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Meng X, Yang Q, Yu X, Zhou J, Ren X, Zhou Y, Xu S. Actin polymerization and ESCRT trigger recruitment of the Fusogens Syntaxin-2 and EFF-1 to promote membrane repair in C. elegans. Dev Cell. 2020;54:1–15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohler WA, Shemer G, del Campo JJ, Valansi C, Opoku-Serebuoh E, Scranton V, Assaf N, White JG, Podbilewicz B. The type I membrane protein EFF-1 is essential for developmental cell fusion. Dev Cell. 2002;2:355–62.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Muliyil S, Narasimha M. Mitochondrial ROS regulates cytoskeletal and mitochondrial remodeling to tune cell and tissue dynamics in a model for wound healing. Dev Cell. 2014;28:239–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nemani N, Carvalho E, Tomar D, Dong Z, Ketschek A, Breves SL, Jana F, Worth AM, Heffler J, Palaniappan P, et al. MIRO-1 determines mitochondrial shape transition upon GPCR activation and Ca(2+) stress. Cell Rep. 2018;23:1005–19.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Neumann B, Coakley S, Giordano-Santini R, Linton C, Lee ES, Nakagawa A, Xue D, Hilliard MA. EFF-1-mediated regenerative axonal fusion requires components of the apoptotic pathway. Nature. 2015;517:219–22.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Niethammer P. The early wound signals. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2016;40:17–22.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Niethammer P, Grabher C, Look AT, Mitchison TJ. A tissue-scale gradient of hydrogen peroxide mediates rapid wound detection in zebrafish. Nature. 2009;459:996–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Noordermeer MA, Veldink GA, Vliegenthart JF. Fatty acid hydroperoxide lyase: a plant cytochrome p450 enzyme involved in wound healing and pest resistance. Chembiochem. 2001;2:494–504.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Norton R, Kobusingye O. Injuries. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1723–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Oren-Suissa M, Hall DH, Treinin M, Shemer G, Podbilewicz B. The fusogen EFF-1 controls sculpting of mechanosensory dendrites. Science. 2010;328:1285–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Perez-Vargas J, Krey T, Valansi C, Avinoam O, Haouz A, Jamin M, Raveh-Barak H, Podbilewicz B, Rey FA. Structural basis of eukaryotic cell-cell fusion. Cell. 2014;157:407–19.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ponte S, Carvalho L, Gagliardi M, Campos I, Oliveira PJ, Jacinto, A. Drp1-mediated mitochondrial fission regulates calcium and F-actin dynamics during wound healing. Biol Open. 2020;9:bio048629.

  46. Pujol N, Cypowyj S, Ziegler K, Millet A, Astrain A, Goncharov A, Jin Y, Chisholm AD, Ewbank JJ. Distinct innate immune responses to infection and wounding in the C. elegans epidermis. Curr Biol. 2008;18:481–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rasmussen JP, English K, Tenlen JR, Priess JR. Notch signaling and morphogenesis of single-cell tubes in the C. elegans digestive tract. Dev Cell. 2008;14:559–69.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Razzell W, Evans IR, Martin P, Wood W. Calcium flashes orchestrate the wound inflammatory response through DUOX activation and hydrogen peroxide release. Curr Biol. 2013;23:424–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sander AL, Jakob H, Sommer K, Sadler C, Fleming I, Marzi I, Frank J. Cytochrome P450-derived epoxyeicosatrienoic acids accelerate wound epithelialization and neovascularization in the hairless mouse ear wound model. Langenbeck's Arch Surg. 2011;396:1245–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Schafer M, Werner S. Oxidative stress in normal and impaired wound repair. Pharmacol Res. 2008;58:165–71.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Shemer G, Suissa M, Kolotuev I, Nguyen KC, Hall DH, Podbilewicz B. EFF-1 is sufficient to initiate and execute tissue-specific cell fusion in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2004;14:1587–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Sonnemann KJ, Bement WM. Wound repair: toward understanding and integration of single-cell and multicellular wound responses. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2011;27:237–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stanisstreet M. Calcium and wound healing in Xenopus early embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol. 1982;67:195–205.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Suzuki N, Mittler R. Reactive oxygen species-dependent wound responses in animals and plants. Free Radic Biol Med. 2012;53:2269–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tong A, Lynn G, Ngo V, Wong D, Moseley SL, Ewbank JJ, Goncharov A, Wu YC, Pujol N, Chisholm AD. Negative regulation of Caenorhabditis elegans epidermal damage responses by death-associated protein kinase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:1457–61.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Turner HN, Patel AA, Cox DN, Galko MJ. Injury-induced cold sensitization in Drosophila larvae involves behavioral shifts that require the TRP channel Brv1. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0209577.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Vaughan EM, Miller AL, Yu HY, Bement WM. Control of local rho GTPase crosstalk by Abr. Curr Biol. 2011;21:270–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Vidal-Diez de Ulzurrun G, Hsueh YP. Predator-prey interactions of nematode-trapping fungi and nematodes: both sides of the coin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2018;102:3939–49.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Wood W, Jacinto A, Grose R, Woolner S, Gale J, Wilson C, Martin P. Wound healing recapitulates morphogenesis in Drosophila embryos. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:907–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Xu S, Chisholm AD. A Galpha(q)-Ca(2+) signaling pathway promotes actin-mediated epidermal wound closure in C. elegans. Curr Biol. 2011;21:1960–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Xu S, Chisholm AD. C. elegans epidermal wounding induces a mitochondrial ROS burst that promotes wound repair. Dev Cell. 2014a;31:48–60.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Xu S, Chisholm AD. Methods for skin wounding and assays for wound responses in C. elegans. J Vis Exp. 2014b;94:51959.

  63. Xu S, Hsiao TI, Chisholm AD. The wounded worm: Using C. elegans to understand the molecular basis of skin wound healing. Worm. 2012;1:134–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Yeoh-Ellerton S, Stacey MC. Iron and 8-isoprostane levels in acute and chronic wounds. J Invest Dermatol. 2003;121:918–25.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Yoo SK, Freisinger CM, LeBert DC, Huttenlocher A. Early redox, Src family kinase, and calcium signaling integrate wound responses and tissue regeneration in zebrafish. J Cell Biol. 2012;199:225–34.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Yoo SK, Starnes TW, Deng Q, Huttenlocher A. Lyn is a redox sensor that mediates leukocyte wound attraction in vivo. Nature. 2011;480:109–12.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang Q, Raoof M, Chen Y, Sumi Y, Sursal T, Junger W, Brohi K, Itagaki K, Hauser CJ. Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury. Nature. 2010;464:104–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhang Y, Li W, Li L, Li Y, Fu R, Zhu Y, Li J, Zhou Y, Xiong S, Zhang H. Structural damage in the C. elegans epidermis causes release of STA-2 and induction of an innate immune response. Immunity. 2015;42:309–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Zhao H, Chen J, Chai J, Zhang Y, Yu C, Pan Z, Gao P, Zong C, Guan Q, Fu Y, et al. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) epoxygenases as potential targets in the management of impaired diabetic wound healing. Lab Investig. 2017;97:782–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhu T, Liang X, Wang XM, Shen K. Dynein and EFF-1 control dendrite morphology by regulating the localization pattern of SAX-7 in epidermal cells. J Cell Sci. 2017;130:4063–71.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Ziegler K, Kurz CL, Cypowyj S, Couillault C, Pophillat M, Pujol N, Ewbank JJ. Antifungal innate immunity in C. elegans: PKCdelta links G protein signaling and a conserved p38 MAPK cascade. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;5:341–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Zugasti O, Bose N, Squiban B, Belougne J, Kurz CL, Schroeder FC, Pujol N, Ewbank JJ. Activation of a G protein-coupled receptor by its endogenous ligand triggers the innate immune response of Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Immunol. 2014;15:833–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zugasti O, Ewbank JJ. Neuroimmune regulation of antimicrobial peptide expression by a noncanonical TGF-beta signaling pathway in Caenorhabditis elegans epidermis. Nat Immunol. 2009;10:249–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Xu lab members for reading and comments on the manuscript.

Funding

Work in the Xu laboratory on C. elegans wound response and repair is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31671522, 31972891, and 91754111).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.M. and J.X. drafted the manuscript, C.S.W. edited the manuscript, and S.X. wrote and edited the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suhong Xu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, Y., Xie, J., Wijaya, C.S. et al. From wound response to repair – lessons from C. elegans. Cell Regen 10, 5 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13619-020-00067-z

Download citation